14 research outputs found
Use of Disease Assessment Methods in Predicting Yield Loss Due to Northern Leaf Blight of Maize
Different severities of northern leaf blight were induced by
inoculating maize plants once at GS 4 and 5, three time at GS 4,5 and
6, allowing natural disease development, and by applying fungicides to
deter disease development on cultivars with different levels of
resistance to Exserohilum turcicum . Percentage leaf area affected by
northern leaf blight on the whole plant, ear, first, and second leaf
above the ear leaf were assessed weekly for a total of six times at GS
8,9.0,9.1,9.2,9.3, and 9.4. Data obtained from the ear leaf, first leaf
above the ear leaf, and second leaf above the ear leaf were used to
develop a one-three-two weighted scale to account for leaf position and
time of infection for the three leaves assessed and were related to
yield by regression analysis. The average disease severity estimated on
the ear leaf was significantly (P ≤ 0.001) correlated with
severities estimated using other disease assessment methods and loss in
grain yield. Overall, AUDPC yield-loss models using percentage leaf
area affected on the ear leaf gave the best relationship (Y= 5835-135
AUDPC, R2 = 0.42, P ≤ 0.001). Further analysis using leaves of
various positions on the plant did not improve the yield-loss models.
Critical point models, using percentage leaf area affected at GS 9.1 on
A619xA632 also gave good fit (R2 = 0.53)
Use of Disease Assessment Methods in Predicting Yield Loss Due to Northern Leaf Blight of Maize
Different severities of northern leaf blight were induced by
inoculating maize plants once at GS 4 and 5, three time at GS 4,5 and
6, allowing natural disease development, and by applying fungicides to
deter disease development on cultivars with different levels of
resistance to Exserohilum turcicum . Percentage leaf area affected by
northern leaf blight on the whole plant, ear, first, and second leaf
above the ear leaf were assessed weekly for a total of six times at GS
8,9.0,9.1,9.2,9.3, and 9.4. Data obtained from the ear leaf, first leaf
above the ear leaf, and second leaf above the ear leaf were used to
develop a one-three-two weighted scale to account for leaf position and
time of infection for the three leaves assessed and were related to
yield by regression analysis. The average disease severity estimated on
the ear leaf was significantly (P 64 0.001) correlated with
severities estimated using other disease assessment methods and loss in
grain yield. Overall, AUDPC yield-loss models using percentage leaf
area affected on the ear leaf gave the best relationship (Y= 5835-135
AUDPC, R2 = 0.42, P 64 0.001). Further analysis using leaves of
various positions on the plant did not improve the yield-loss models.
Critical point models, using percentage leaf area affected at GS 9.1 on
A619xA632 also gave good fit (R2 = 0.53)
Inheritance of race-nonspecific resistance to Exserohilum turcicum in maize synthetic population OhS10
Progeny tests of resistant lines derived from maize (Zea mays L.)
synthetic population OhS10 were conducted at one location during two
years (1993-94) in Ohio (Guerne) and at two locations during one year
(1993) in Uganda (Kabanyolo and Namulonge) to examine the inheritance
of resistance to Exserohilum turcicum(Pass.), causal agent of northern
leaf blight (NLB). Individual plants in single ear derived selfed
progenies (S1 and S1:2) were inoculated in a controlled fashion
(Guerne, Namulonge) or naturally infected (Kabanyolo). Host responses
to infection were characterized by determining area under the disease
progress curve (AUDPC), calculated from percent leaf area affected
(PLAA) and lesion number counts, and lesion size. The majority of S1
and S1:2 progenies had few lesions, low rates of disease development,
and high levels of resistance, indicating that multiple factors govern
expression of resistance. Of the progenies tested, S20-4, S30-5, S30-6
and S30-7 exhibited consistently high levels of resistance to NLB.Des tests de descendance des lignees resistantes obtenues a partir
d'une population synthetique de mais OhS10 ont ete executes a un
endroit pendant deux annees (1993-1994) Ohio (Guerne) et a deux
endroits pendant une annee (1993) en Ouganda (Kabanyolo et Namulonge)
pour examiner la transmission de la resistance a Exserohilum turcicum
(Pass.), qui cause le rouille des feuilles (qui sevit au nord) (NLB).
Les plantes individuelles des progenies obtenues par descendance
autofecondee issue d'un epis unique (S1 et S1:2) etaient inoculees de
facon controee (Guerne, Namulonge) ou infectees naturellement
(Kabanyolo). Les reponses des infections etaient caracterisees par la
determination de la surface en dessous de la courbe de progres de la
maladie (AUDPC), qui etaient calculee a partir du pourcentage de
surface de la feuille affectee (PLAA) et le nombre des lesions et la
taille de lesions. La majoritedes descendants S1 et S1:2 avaient peu de
lesions, un developpement ralentie de la maladie et un niveau de
resistance eleve, ce qui indique que plusieurs paramtres influencent
l'expression de la resistance. S20-4, S30-5, S30-6 et S30-7 montrent un
niveau de resistance eleve contre NLB
The effect of potato variety mixtures on epidemics of late blight, in relation to plot size and level of resistance
Potatoes of a number of varieties of contrasting levels of resistance were planted in pure or mixed stands in four experiments over 3 years. Three experiments compared the late blight severity and progress in mixtures with that in pure stands. Disease on susceptible or moderately resistant varieties typical of those in commercial use was similar in mixtures and pure stands. In 2 of 3 years, there were slight reductions on cv. Sante, which is moderately susceptible, in mixture with cv. Cara, which is moderately resistant. Cara was unaffected by this mixture. Mixtures of an immune or near-immune partner with Cara or Sante substantially reduced disease on the latter. The effect of the size of plots of individual varieties or mixtures on blight severity was compared in two experiments. Larger plots had a greater area under the disease progress curve, but the average rate of disease progress was greater in smaller plots; this may be because most disease progress took place later, under more favourable conditions, in the smaller plots. In one experiment, two planting densities were used. Density had no effect on disease and did not interact with mixture effects. The overall conclusion is that, while mixtures of potato varieties may be desirable for other reasons, they do not offer any improvement on the average of the disease resistance of the components